Several lexer rules can match the same input text. In that case, the token type will be chosen as follows:
'{'
), use the implicit ruleThe following combined grammar:
grammar LexerPriorityRulesExample;
// Parser rules
randomParserRule: 'foo'; // Implicitly declared token type
// Lexer rules
BAR: 'bar';
IDENTIFIER: [A-Za-z]+;
BAZ: 'baz';
WS: [ \t\r\n]+ -> skip;
Given the following input:
aaa foo bar baz barz
Will produce the following token sequence from the lexer:
IDENTIFIER 'foo' BAR IDENTIFIER IDENTIFIER
aaa
is of type IDENTIFIER
Only the IDENTIFIER
rule can match this token, there is no ambiguity.
foo
is of type 'foo'
The parser rule randomParserRule
introduces the implicit 'foo'
token type, which is prioritary over the IDENTIFIER
rule.
bar
is of type BAR
This text matches the BAR
rule, which is defined before the IDENTIFIER
rule, and therefore has precedence.
baz
is of type IDENTIFIER
This text matches the BAZ
rule, but it also matches the IDENTIFIER
rule. The latter is chosen as it is defined before BAR
.
Given the grammar, BAZ
will never be able to match, as the IDENTIFIER
rule already covers everything BAZ
can match.
barz
is of type IDENTIFIER
The BAR
rule can match the first 3 characters of this string (bar
), but the IDENTIFIER
rule will match 4 characters. As IDENTIFIER
matches a longer substring, it is chosen over BAR
.
As a rule of thumb, specific rules should de defined before more generic rules. If a rule can only match an input which is already covered by a previously defined rule, it will never be used.
Implicitly defined rules such as 'foo'
act as if they were defined before all other lexer rules.
Lexer rules define token types. Their name has to start with an uppercase letter to distinguish them from parser rules.
INTEGER: [0-9]+;
IDENTIFIER: [a-zA-Z_] [a-zA-Z_0-9]*;
OPEN_PAREN: '(';
CLOSE_PAREN: ')';
Basic syntax:
Syntax | Meaning |
---|---|
A | Match lexer rule or fragment named A |
A B | Match A followed by B |
(A|B) | Match either A or B |
'text' | Match literal "text" |
A? | Match A zero or one time |
A* | Match A zero or more times |
A+ | Match A one or more times |
[A-Z0-9] | Match one character in the defined ranges (in this example between A-Z or 0-9) |
'a'..'z' | Alternative syntax for a character range |
~[A-Z] | Negation of a range - match any single character not in the range |
. | Match any single character |
Fragments are reusable parts of lexer rules which cannot match on their own - they need to be referenced from a lexer rule.
INTEGER: DIGIT+
| '0' [Xx] HEX_DIGIT+
;
fragment DIGIT: [0-9];
fragment HEX_DIGIT: [0-9A-Fa-f];
When tokens like '{'
are used in a parser rule, an implicit lexer rule will be created for them unless an explicit rule exists.
In other words, if you have a lexer rule:
OPEN_BRACE: '{';
Then both of these parser rules are equivalent:
parserRule: '{';
parserRule: OPEN_BRACE;
But if the OPEN_BRACE
lexer rule is not defined, an implicit anonymous rule will be created. In that case, the implicit rule will be defined as if it were defined before the other rules: it will have a higher priority than other rules.
A lexer rule can have associated commands:
WHITESPACE: [ \r\n] -> skip;
Commands are defined after a ->
at the end of the rule.
skip
: Skips the matched text, no token will be emitedchannel(n)
: Emits the token on a different channeltype(n)
: Changes the emitted token typemode(n)
, pushMode(n)
, popMode
, more
: Controls lexer modesA lexer action is a block of arbitrary code in the target language surrounded by {
...}
, which is executed during matching:
IDENTIFIER: [A-Z]+ { log("matched rule"); };
A semantic predicate is a block of arbitrary code in the target language surrounded by {
...}?
, which evaluates to a boolean value. If the returned value is false, the lexer rule is skipped.
IDENTIFIER: [A-Z]+ { identifierIsValid() }?;
Semantic predicates should be defined at the end of the rule whenever possible for performance reasons.